Home

About Eric

RSS

Complete Archive




My Favorite Books

Series:

Source Control HOWTO

Marketing for Geeks

The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing

The Business of Software

WPF 3D

Topics:

Software Development

WPF

Business

Laughs

SourceGear


Related Sites:

www.NotALegend.com

www.SourceGear.com

www.Teamprise.com

     

Outlook 2003

A bit begrudgingly, I am ready to admit that I like Outlook 2003.

When it comes to email clients, I am probably one of the fussiest people in the world.  I've used lots of different email apps and most of them are just lame.  I've been crabby about this topic for so long it seems like the last decent email client I used was Eudora 3.0.

If I were to rank the worst email clients I have ever tried, the various versions of Outlook would hold the top few spots on the list.  Outlook 2000 was particularly awful. 

But I recently switched to Outlook 2003, and strangely enough, I actually like it.  Here's why:

  • It doesn't feel absurdly slow like its ancestors.

  • It doesn't treat me like a villain for the fact that we don't use Exchange.  We've had our mail server running under Linux for ages, and we've never found a compelling reason to change.

  • It doesn't treat me like a luddite for the fact that I don't like HTML mail.  This is the first version of Outlook which works well with good-old-fashioned plain text email.  I had to fiddle with the options quite a bit, but the result works perfectly.  All my incoming mails are converted to plaintext.  All my sent emails are in plaintext, even if I am responding to a message in some other weirdo format.

  • It still lets me see HTML mail when I want to.  Even though I have all my incoming mails converted to plaintext, I can click a button in the message window to show that message as HTML.  It doesn't change my global setting for other messages.  It simply allows me to see the underlying HTML.

  • It doesn't load inline images in HTML unless I specifically say so.  No more unwanted pictures in my face.

  • It has taught me that I'm not quite as good of a speller as I thought I was.  Believe it or not, I have never used a mail client with built-in spell checking.  I'm a pretty decent speller, so it hasn't been much of an issue.  But since I switched to Outlook 2003, I've been amazed at the number of typos and spelling errors caught by the spell checker.  My apologies to all those people over the years who have endured as I misspelled the word "committment".

  • It has cool flags for followup.  I like to click the flag column to mark messages which need my attention.  Outlook 2003 keeps a special folder which aggregates all my flagged items together in one view, regardless of where they are located elsewhere in the folder hierarchy.  Neato.

  • It groups items in folders by day, with tree control behavior, allowing me to expand and collapse a whole day's messages at one time.

  • NewsGator.  I like SharpReader, but I'm now giving NewsGator a try.  So far I am very impressed.  It's cool having my subscribed feeds show up right there in my mail reader.