|
Friday, June 23, 2006
Five Things Every Micro-ISV Should Know About Intellectual Property
Running a Micro-ISV is different from running a more
traditional small business. We don't sell tangible property like hammers or
cheeseburgers. Our products are intangible. Our business model exists only
because governments have intellectual property laws which allow us to
exclusively own certain rights and to control the terms under which we trade
some of those rights for money. It seems rather important that we have a basic
understanding of these laws.
I am not a lawyer. Nothing I say in this article should be
construed as providing legal advice. I'm just providing some very basic
information.
1. Copyrights, trademarks, and patents are all different.
In the United States, the law defines three main forms of
intellectual property:
- Copyrights are used to protect a specific expression of
something.
- Trademarks are used to protect a distinctive symbol or
name which is used to identify a business or product.
- Patents are used to trademark an invention such as a
method or process.
Unfortunately, many people tend to confuse these terms. For
example:
- It makes no sense to ask if the word "podcast" is
copyrighted. You can't copyright a word. That's what trademarks are for.
. If I develop a new database and call it Oracle, I am violating a
trademark, not a copyright.
- Similarly, don't ask if HTML is patented. You can't
patent a markup language. Rather, ask if there are any patented methods
which are related to HTML.
These three concepts are distinct. Every Micro-ISV will use
copyrights. Many will use trademarks. A few will use patents.
2. Copyrights are simple.
The owner of a copyright has the exclusive right to control
the reproduction of something. Copyrights protect a specific expression of
something. A song can be copyrighted, thus making it illegal to make copies of
that song without permission. A piece of software can be copyrighted, thus
making it illegal to make copies of that software without permission.
Copyrights are the most important form of intellectual
property protection for a Micro-ISV. When I create a piece of software and
start selling other people the right to use a copy of it, it is important to me
that anyone who makes illegal copies of my software is violating the law.
Luckily, copyrights are also the most simple form of intellectual
property protection. There are no special steps to become the owner of a
copyright. When I create a piece of software, I implicitly and automatically
own a copyright on my work. The government allows me to register that
copyright if I want, and doing so may strengthen my position in a court battle,
but registration is not essential. I simply label my work "Copyright 2006 Eric
Sink", and that's enough.
3. Trademarks are freaky.
A trademark protects the logo or name that you use to
identify your business or product. It would unfair for me to start selling a
database product called Oracle. Customers would get confused. The law
protects Oracle Corporation by granting them the exclusive right to use that
word in the sale of database products.
However, trademarks are kind of freaky, for three reasons:
- A registered trademark is very different from an
unregistered trademark.
Just as with copyrights, you don't
have to register anything with the government to get trademark protection.
However, unlike the situation with copyrights, a registered trademark is very
different from an unregistered one.
Registering a trademark is
expensive and very time-consuming. You should get a lawyer to help you. Plan
to spend $1,000 or more. It will probably take more than a year to complete
the process. Your application might get denied. However, if you successfully
get your trademark registered, you end up with very strong protection. With a
registered trademark, you can put the circle-R symbol next to your mark whenever
you use it. If someone violates your mark, you are very likely to win a
resulting lawsuit.
Proceeding with an unregistered
trademark is simpler. Just put (tm) next to your logo or name. That's it. By
doing so, you are simply informing the world of your claim to the exclusive use
of the mark. If you find yourself in conflict with some other party, you might
win, or you might not.
- A trademark is limited in scope.
You can't globally trademark
something for all kinds of situations. Your trademark protection is valid only
for the industry or market segment in which you are doing business. I can't
start selling a database product called Oracle, but I am perfectly free to
start selling a toothpaste called Oracle.
- If you don't defend your trademark, you lose it.
Trademark law says that your mark
is protected by law only if you are actively protecting it. If someone
violates your mark, you must object. If you don't, you have weakened your
position for any situation that comes up later.
4. Patents are absurd.
A patent is the strongest form of intellectual property
protection. Patents are used to protect a method or technique, regardless of
its expression.
With copyrights, accidental infringement is more or less
impossible. If I start selling a spreadsheet product which is byte-for-byte
identical to Microsoft Excel, nobody is going to believe me when I claim that I
just happened to come up with the same string of bits that Microsoft did.
In contrast, accidental infringement of a patent is quite
possible. Microsoft Excel is probably covered by a whole bunch of patents. If
I create a spreadsheet product, the likelihood that I may use a patented
technique is rather high.
Software patents today are primarily used in one of two
ways:
- Companies like Microsoft are building up large collections
of patents. In general, their patent arsenal is a defensive weapon. They
have patents so that they can counter-sue whenever somebody sues them for
patent infringement. Microsoft gets sued regularly over patent issues. I
cannot think of a single case where Microsoft sued a small company over a
patent issue.
- Patent Trolls are companies which do nothing but purchase
patents and use them to threaten and sue other companies.
I am not opposed to software patents in principle, but I do
believe patent law needs to be reformed. Patents carry a 17 year term, which
is far too long for software. Patents are being granted for "inventions" which
are obvious. Patent trolls should be banned and violators should be sentenced
to a lifetime of driving around Boston. The current situation is absurd.
Obtaining a patent is even more costly and time-consuming
than a registered trademark. Plan to spend $25,000 or more.
Patents can be valuable, but a Micro-ISV can have a long and
healthy life without ever obtaining one.
5. Licenses are virtual.
From a practical standpoint, buying software is often very
simple. I run to Best Buy and grab a copy of Doom 3. I give the cashier 50
bucks. Simple.
From a legal perspective, the transaction was a lot more
complicated. First of all, it is important to note that I have not purchased
any copyrights, trademarks or patents. All that stuff is still owned by the
publisher and developer of the game. Because they own the intellectual
property, the law gives them certain exclusive rights.
Rather, I have purchased a box, a CD-ROM, and a license.
This license is not a physical thing, but a legal concept. The license grants
me certain rights, subject to certain restrictions.
Don't confuse the notion of a license with any of the things
that are often associated with it:
- When I buy software, I may get something called a serial
number, CD key, activation code, or license key. This is not a license.
It is merely something which is designed to encourage or require me to
comply with the restrictions of the license.
- When I buy software, I may get a printed license agreement
booklet. This is not a license. It is a document which describes the
license. Photocopying that document does not increase the number of
licenses I have.
- When I buy a computer with Windows XP, I may find a
holographic sticker on the back. This sticker is not a license. It is a
physical item which represents the license and which may be used to prove
that I have a license.
Think of as two things: Rights and restrictions. The
recipient of the license gets certain rights, subject to certain restrictions.
Further Information
Remember, I am not a lawyer. Furthermore, this little
article merely scratches the surface of a rather large subject.
So, you have just read an article which is terribly
incomplete and which was written by someone with no credibility at all. You
are worse off than you were when you started.
To fix this problem, you should probably do two things:
- Find a lawyer. Try to find one that genuinely
wants to help you succeed in your business. Try to avoid working with any
lawyer whose basic mission is to make you afraid of everything.
- Read more stuff. A few suggested books:
- Web
& Software Development: A Legal Guide (I have an earlier edition
of this book. Excellent.)
- Trademark:
Legal Care for Your Business & Product Name (I've got this
book. It's very good.)
- The
Entrepreneur's Guide to Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, Trade Secrets
& Licensing
- Patents,
Copyrights & Trademarks for Dummies
Final Thoughts
- Yes, I know, there are actually four main areas of
intellectual property law, not three. I omitted trade secret law here for
simplicity.
- The comments on this post would be an excellent place to
post your favorite lawyer jokes. I'll start:
Q: Why don't sharks attack
lawyers?
A: Professional courtesy.
:-)
|